Artificial Sweeteners Linked to Cognitive Decline

A groundbreaking eight-year observational study has uncovered concerning links between artificial sweeteners and cognitive decline.

Published in the September 3, 2025, issue of Neurology, the research reveals that regular consumption of common sugar substitutes may accelerate memory deterioration and reduce cognitive skills in middle-aged adults.

This comprehensive investigation provides compelling evidence that the sweeteners used in our foods and beverages may have lasting impacts on brain health.

The Hidden Cost of Sugar Substitutes

For decades, artificial sweeteners have been marketed as healthier alternatives to sugar. However, the recent study from the University of São Paulo in Brazil challenges this perception.

Researchers tracked more than 12,000 adults with a median age of 52 for an average of eight years, focusing on seven common sugar substitutes: aspartame, saccharin, acesulfame-K, erythritol, xylitol, sorbitol, and tagatose.

The findings were striking: participants who consumed the largest amount of these sweeteners, an average of 191 mg/day, experienced a 62% faster decline in their overall thinking and memory skills compared to those who consumed the least (around 20 mg/day).

Researcher examining brain scans showing cognitive decline patterns

“A 62% faster decline means that people in the highest group of sweetener consumption experienced cognitive aging at a much quicker pace than expected, which could increase their risk of earlier impairment later in life. While our study cannot prove causation, this magnitude of association raises concern that frequent sweetener consumption is not a harmless habit.”

— Dr. Claudia Kimie Suemoto, Associate Professor at the University of São Paulo

Dr. Suemoto further explained that participants who consumed the largest amounts of artificial sweeteners showed declines in memory and overall thinking skills similar to what would be expected after 1.6 extra years of aging, a significant acceleration in cognitive deterioration.

Why Middle-Aged Adults Are Particularly Vulnerable

One of the most surprising findings was that the association between artificial sweetener consumption and cognitive decline was most significant among participants younger than 60 years old.

This contradicts the common assumption that older adults would be more susceptible to such effects.

Additionally, people with diabetes showed an even faster rate of cognitive decline when consuming high levels of artificial sweeteners.

This is particularly concerning as people with diabetes are often encouraged to use sugar substitutes to manage blood glucose levels.

“Our results suggest that midlife exposure to sweeteners may be particularly harmful, which is important because midlife is a critical period for setting the trajectory of brain health. Cognitive decline and dementia are thought to begin developing decades before symptoms become noticeable.”

— Dr. Claudia Kimie Suemoto, University of São Paulo

Most Affected Groups

  • Adults under 60 years old
  • People with diabetes
  • Regular consumers of diet beverages
  • Those who consume multiple types of artificial sweeteners

Cognitive Skills Affected

  • Memory retention and recall
  • Overall thinking skills
  • Information processing speed
  • Executive function

Decoding the Science Behind the Findings

While the study establishes a correlation rather than causation, researchers have proposed several mechanisms that might explain how artificial sweeteners could impact brain function.

Previous animal studies and emerging research on the gut-brain connection support these hypotheses.

Neuroinflammation

Some artificial sweeteners, particularly aspartame, may trigger inflammatory responses in the brain. Chronic inflammation is associated with accelerated cognitive decline and neurodegenerative diseases.

Gut-Brain Axis Disruption

Sugar alcohols, such as erythritol and sorbitol, can alter gut microbiota composition, potentially compromising the blood-brain barrier and impacting neural communication pathways.

Metabolic Dysregulation

Artificial sweeteners may interfere with glucose metabolism in the brain, which relies on glucose as its primary energy source for optimal function.

Dr. Kamal Wagle, a geriatric specialist not involved in the study, noted: “While the finding that high consumption is linked to a faster decline is thought-provoking, it’s crucial to immediately highlight what the researchers themselves pointed out: this study shows a link, not a cause.”

The Six Problematic Sweeteners

Of the seven sweeteners examined in the study, six were found to be associated with cognitive decline. Only tagatose showed no significant correlation with reduced cognitive function.

SweetenerCommon ProductsCognitive ImpactRecommended Alternative
AspartameDiet sodas, sugar-free gumSignificant decline in memoryMonk fruit extract
SaccharinSweet’N Low, diet foodsModerate decline in overall cognitionSmall amounts of honey
Acesulfame-KSoft drinks, baked goodsSignificant decline in thinking skillsStevia (pure leaf)
ErythritolKeto products, sugar-free candiesModerate decline in memoryAllulose
XylitolSugar-free gum, toothpasteMild decline in overall cognitionFruit purees
SorbitolSugar-free candies, mintsMild decline in thinking skillsDate paste

Building on Previous Research

This study adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting potential health risks associated with artificial sweeteners. Previous research has linked these substances to various health concerns:

  • A potential negative impact on gut microbiome composition and diversity
  • Higher risk of cardiovascular events, including heart attack and stroke
  • Increased risk of metabolic syndrome and obesity
  • Possible links to migraines and certain types of cancer
  • Disruption of glucose metabolism, particularly in people with diabetes

The Calorie Control Council, representing the low- and reduced-calorie food and beverage industry, has emphasized that correlation does not equal causation and pointed to the study’s limitations, including reliance on self-reported dietary data collected only at baseline.

Practical Steps to Reduce Artificial Sweetener Consumption

For those concerned about the potential cognitive effects of artificial sweeteners, registered dietitian nutritionist Monique Richard, MS, RDN, LDN, offers several practical recommendations:

Person preparing natural sweetener alternatives in a kitchen

Conduct a Sweetener Audit

Scan food labels for common sweeteners like aspartame, sucralose, saccharin, and acesulfame-K. Track your daily “sweet hits” from drinks, bars, yogurts, and gums for a week to understand your consumption patterns.

Taper Intake Gradually

Reduce sweetener use by 25-50% over a period of two to four weeks. Transition to naturally flavored seltzer, unsweetened tea, or water with citrus, berries, or herbs for flavor without artificial sweeteners.

Retrain Your Taste Buds

Try the “apple test”: rate how sweet an apple tastes on a scale of 1-10. A low rating may indicate frequent consumption of highly sweetened foods. Over time, taste buds can be “retrained” to appreciate natural sweetness.

Natural Flavor Enhancers

Instead of relying on artificial sweeteners, try these natural flavor enhancers:

  • Vanilla extract in coffee or oatmeal
  • Cinnamon for a sweet-spicy flavor boost
  • Cocoa powder (unsweetened) for chocolate notes
  • Citrus zest for bright, aromatic sweetness
  • Fresh ginger in teas and smoothies
  • Mint leaves in water or yogurt
  • Cardamom for exotic sweetness
  • Fresh or frozen fruit as natural sweeteners
Natural sweetener alternatives arranged on a wooden table

When Natural Sweetness Is Needed:

Try small amounts of honey, maple syrup, fruit purees, pure sugarcane, agave, or monk fruit to sweeten beverages, baked goods, dressings, sauces, or desserts.

Remember that a little goes a long way!

The Need for Further Research

While this eight-year study provides compelling evidence of a link between artificial sweeteners and cognitive decline, researchers emphasize the need for additional investigation to establish causation and understand the underlying mechanisms.

Dr. Kamal Wagle suggests that future research should focus on understanding the “why” behind this link through more controlled studies and investigation of biological mechanisms.

Particularly important areas for exploration include:

  • How specific sweeteners might affect brain cells or vascular health
  • Why was the link found in people under 60 but not in older adults
  • Why was the effect more pronounced in those with diabetes
  • The differences between tagatose (which showed no association with decline) and the other six sweeteners

Until more definitive research is available, experts suggest a cautious approach.

As Dr. Suemoto advises: “Our study suggests that high consumption of artificial sweeteners may be linked to faster cognitive decline.

While more research is needed before making firm recommendations, it would be reasonable for people to reduce their intake as much as possible, ideally avoiding these products altogether.”

“Don’t fear, but do add flavor and see how you can filter out the ‘hyper-sweet’ and synthetic additives in the diet for a healthier body and brain.”

— Monique Richard, MS, RDN, LDN

Spread the love

Farah Sabir

Master of Science
Nutritional Science (San Jose State University)

Recommended Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *